chad’s review published on Letterboxd:
was expecting to be more excited about this one, but if I has to pick which is better, I’d say without a doubt the first movie. this was great, I really loved how it utilized flashbacks, and just having De Niro takes the cake for me. but I don’t know, the film even felt longer than the first film which I had no trouble watching. (yes I know it actually is longer, I’m just saying it FEELS longer.) anyway, I’ve read a lot of comments that the third part is the underappreciated one, so let’s see how that goes.